Strength, explained · Lesson 1

Do you need to build more muscle to get stronger?

Not always, and not right away. Your max, the heaviest weight you can lift once, rises first because you learn the lift; over the years, muscle size makes most of the difference. No need to choose: several heavy sets train both, and for your max, do them on the lift itself.

Updated on · 10 studies cited · 3 min read

Lesson cover : Strength or size
Watch the lesson · @thegym_explained on TikTok

Strength or size: what’s the difference?

Your strength is often measured by your max, your 1RM: the heaviest weight you can lift just once. Your muscle is its size. Both rise together, but not at the same pace: your max is partly a skill, which improves most when you practice it or lift close to your max (Buckner et al., 2017).

Why does your weight rise faster than your muscle?

In a study of 32 young volunteers, those who did 12 weeks of leg extensions saw their weight rise by about 200%, roughly tripling, while the strength of their thigh, measured with the leg held still, rose only 15 to 20%. For the authors, most of it came from better coordination of the other muscles in the movement, like those holding the body steady (Rutherford and Jones, 1986). That’s their conclusion, not a direct measurement.

Skill weighs most early in training, but muscle also starts growing from the outset (Folland and Williams, 2007).

Do you need to get bigger to raise your max?

In 38 beginners, over 8 weeks of leg extension and chest press, one group did 4 sets to failure, the other just up to 5 attempts at their max per session. The first group gained more muscle at most measured sites, but the max rose the same in both (Mattocks et al., 2017).

In 34 trained men, 1, 3 or 5 sets per exercise for 8 weeks: the same progress on squat and bench press, but more muscle with more sets, for example +5.0% versus +13.7% on the side of the thigh (Schoenfeld et al., 2019). Across 67 studies, more sets also add strength, but that gain levels off much sooner than for muscle (Pelland et al., 2026).

Does muscle matter for strength?

Yes, over the years. 16 men trained for 4 years on average, against 52 untrained men: 60% more quad strength, measured with the knee held still, and 56% more muscle on MRI. For the authors, muscle size is the main explanation for that strength (Maden-Wilkinson et al., 2020). It’s a comparison between two groups, not a trial.

The exact role of growth is still debated: for some, it contributes to strength gains (Taber et al., 2019); for others, no experiment yet shows it to be a mechanism (Loenneke et al., 2019).

Do you have to choose between strength and size?

No. A large analysis, 178 studies for strength and 119 for muscle, ranks several heavy sets first for strength, above 80% of max, three times a week; for muscle, several heavy sets twice a week, while all the formulas tested built muscle comparably (Currier et al., 2023).

And for your max, do your heavy sets on the lift itself: it’s a skill, which improves most when you practice it (Buckner et al., 2017).

Your workout plan, built for your body.

In Tekio, your chest has a Strength card and a Volume card: you track both separately.

Download on the App Store

Sources

Studies checked in PubMed. Measured muscle activity isn’t growth: each fact keeps its study’s population and limits.

  1. Buckner SL, Jessee MB, Mattocks KT, et al. (2017). Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement. Sports Med 47(2):193-195. PubMed · DOI
  2. Rutherford OM, Jones DA (1986). The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 55(1):100-5. PubMed · DOI
  3. Folland JP, Williams AG (2007). The adaptations to strength training : morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med 37(2):145-68. PubMed · DOI
  4. Mattocks KT, Buckner SL, Jessee MB, et al. (2017). Practicing the Test Produces Strength Equivalent to Higher Volume Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 49(9):1945-1954. PubMed · DOI
  5. Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Krieger J, et al. (2019). Resistance Training Volume Enhances Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength in Trained Men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 51(1):94-103. PubMed · DOI
  6. Pelland JC, Remmert JF, Robinson ZP, et al. (2026). The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains. Sports Med 56(2):481-505. PubMed · DOI
  7. Maden-Wilkinson TM, Balshaw TG, Massey GJ, et al. (2020). What makes long-term resistance-trained individuals so strong? A comparison of skeletal muscle morphology, architecture, and joint mechanics. J Appl Physiol (1985) 128(4):1000-1011. PubMed · DOI
  8. Taber CB, Vigotsky A, Nuckols G, et al. (2019). Exercise-Induced Myofibrillar Hypertrophy is a Contributory Cause of Gains in Muscle Strength. Sports Med 49(7):993-997. PubMed · DOI
  9. Loenneke JP, Dankel SJ, Bell ZW, et al. (2019). Is muscle growth a mechanism for increasing strength? Med Hypotheses 125:51-56. PubMed · DOI
  10. Currier BS, Mcleod JC, Banfield L, et al. (2023). Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 57(18):1211-1220. PubMed · DOI

These lessons inform; they don’t replace advice from a health professional.